Beyond Storage: How Custody Is Evolving to Meet Institutional Needs

Beyond Storage: How Custody Is Evolving to Meet Institutional Needs 1

This post is part of CoinDesk’s 2019 Year in Review, a collection of 100 op-eds, interviews and takes on the state of blockchain and the world. Diogo Monica is president and co-founder of Anchorage, crypto’s premier custodian for institutional investors. 

The last few years have seen the formation of many crypto-focused hedge funds and venture capital funds, whose collective assets under management total in the billions of dollars: institutional investors including Blockchain Capital, BlockTower, Paradigm and Polychain, among others. These funds know the blockchain ecosystem as well as anyone in the world. 

We’re grateful institutional investors who know crypto best are helping to inform the development of our custody product. Clients tell us what they need, and we partner with them to build what they require. Through this process, we’ve learned some lessons worth sharing because they offer meaningful insight into the crypto space and how it’s evolving.

1. Institutional investors want more from their custodian

Because digital assets are bearer assets, most investment activities involve handling the underlying private keys. This means custody plays a much bigger role in crypto investors’ day-to-day operations than in traditional finance. Whatever investors want to do with their assets – buy and hold, exit a major position, actively trade, participate in staking and governance – the custodian will be involved. 

As such, institutional investors want custodians to make buying and selling digital assets as easy and painless as possible. What’s typically a multi-step process, including navigating exchanges and OTC dealers, finding the best price, manually transferring crypto from or to custody, is ripe for disruption by custodians. Regulated trading involves custody and custody relies on technology, which means providing even simple financial services (like the ability to buy, hold and sell an asset) requires highly advanced underlying infrastructure in the custody function.

Funds and institutions should be able to focus on their investment strategies without having to worry about security or moving millions of dollars in crypto between addresses. The onus is on custodians to enable their clients to sell or buy directly through custody.

2. Cold storage isn’t working for institutional use cases

Institutional investors are painfully aware of the major hot wallet breaches our industry has suffered and the chilling effect they’ve had on the whole ecosystem. To counteract the risks of online exposure, custodians have attempted to secure assets by generating and managing keys entirely offline through a manual human process called “cold storage.” Holding assets offline is necessary for security purposes, but institutional investors are frustrated with cold storage as it has traditionally been implemented.

Questioning the practicality of cold storage is not something we at Anchorage take lightly: As project leads for the Glacier Protocol, my co-founder and I helped develop a step-by-step method for bitcoin self-custody that relies on cold storage. Cold storage has been instrumental for the broader adoption of decentralized currencies, allowing people with non-technical backgrounds to safely store their crypto assets offline. It was and continues to be a sensible custody solution for many retail investors. 

But cold storage comes with serious usability constraints, and institutional investors have complex usability needs that cold storage simply cannot satisfy. 

For one, institutional investors have an obligation to their LPs to generate as much yield as possible on their behalf. Cold storage is an impediment to institutions’ ability to quickly execute trades. When a time-sensitive trading opportunity arises, custodians must be able to ensure that a client’s assets are readily accessible for trading at a moment’s notice. Traditional forms of cold storage can entail hours or even days of waiting to withdraw assets, at which point trading opportunities are lost. Institutional custody providers must develop solutions that make offline assets easily accessible and securely tradeable.  

Second, institutional investors are demanding staking and governance, two forms of on-chain participation that require the use of private keys for online operations. Some cold storage custodians rely on delegation and proxy contracts, technologies that enable one key or contract to act on behalf of another. But not all projects allow delegated staking, and proxy contracts can increase surface-of-attack and introduce unnecessary risk.

As more projects come to market with mechanisms requiring active participation, institutional investors, which have a major stake in their investments’ health and success, will rely on their custodians to act accordingly and get the most out of their holdings.

3. Institutional investors require solutions designed for multi-person teams

The fact that institutional funds are managed collectively presents its own set of challenges. While “not your keys, not your crypto” has become a common refrain among adherents to the value of self-sovereignty, which individual should ultimately control crypto keys owned by an institutional fund? 

We believe the keys must be controlled by a multi-person team. Providers are using different solutions to achieve this result: some use Shamir’s Secret Sharing (a cryptography algorithm that divides keys into multiple parts), others use physical controls. We at Anchorage associate a unique key with each user and require all sensitive operations to be signed by a quorum of user keys. 

But multi-person approval is only part of the solution. The custodian must verify institutional intent – in other words, the custodian must ensure that a given operation represents what the client organization wants to do, and not just what a rogue individual or rogue group wants to do. We believe institutional intent is best verified by authenticating each human approver for a given operation, not just verifying possession of a shard or user key; and by enabling institutional investors to configure customizable quorums based on the nature of the operation, since different team members may have different domains of authority.

In sum, the role of custodians is evolving as the crypto ecosystem matures.

Institutional investors have different needs than retail users, while new coins that offer staking and governance demand on-chain participation. If the first wave of custody solutions was designed to help individuals hold and trade bitcoin, then the second wave will be trained on satisfying the needs of institutions and enabling full participation in all cryptocurrencies.

Disclosure Read More

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Beyond Storage: How Custody Is Evolving to Meet Institutional Needs 2
About the author

E-Crypto News was developed to assist all cryptocurrency investors in developing profitable cryptocurrency portfolios through the provision of timely and much-needed information. Investments in cryptocurrency require a level of detail, sensitivity, and accuracy that isn’t required in any other market and as such, we’ve developed our databases to help fill in information gaps.

Related Posts

E-Crypto News Executive Interviews



bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 42,360.00
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,867.78
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 2.26
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
binance-coin
Binance Coin (BNB) $ 343.42
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.925654
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 131.82
usd-coin
USD Coin (USDC) $ 1.00
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 29.04
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.206601
USD
EUR
GBP
bitcoinBitcoin (BTC)
$ 42,360.00
ethereumEthereum (ETH)
$ 2,867.78
tetherTether (USDT)
$ 1.00
bitcoin-cashBitcoin Cash (BCH)
$ 511.01
litecoinLitecoin (LTC)
$ 149.59
bitcoinBitcoin (BTC)
36.089,45
ethereumEthereum (ETH)
2.443,26
tetherTether (USDT)
0,851970
bitcoin-cashBitcoin Cash (BCH)
435,37
litecoinLitecoin (LTC)
127,45
bitcoinBitcoin (BTC)
30,909.46
ethereumEthereum (ETH)
2,092.58
tetherTether (USDT)
0.729685
bitcoin-cashBitcoin Cash (BCH)
372.88
litecoinLitecoin (LTC)
109.15

Automated trading with HaasBot Crypto Trading Bots

Crypto Scams

Crypto Scams
Crypto Scams Still Persistent In 2021, SEC Warns About Red Flags To Watch
September 9, 2021
Poly Network
Here’s How Hackers Stole Over $600 million in the Poly Network Attack
August 12, 2021
The World’s Most Infamous Crypto Hacks and Scams
July 31, 2021
Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Cryptocurrency Exchanges and the Plague of Scams and Bans
June 29, 2021
What Role Do Cryptocurrencies Play In The Era Of Ransomware Attacks?
June 9, 2021

Blockchain/Cryptocurrency Questions and Answers

Beginner’s Guide to Investing in Cryptocurrency
August 9, 2021
Short-Sell Cryptocurrency
How to Short-Sell Cryptocurrency: A Brief Overview
July 17, 2021
Klaytn
What Is Klaytn (KLAY) And How Does It Work?
July 16, 2021
Cryptocurrencies
Our Crypto Roundup Interview Asks- Do Cryptocurrencies Have a Future?
July 15, 2021
Solana
What Is Solana (SOL) And How Does It Work?
June 26, 2021


CryptoCurrencyUSDChange 1hChange 24hChange 7d
Bitcoin42,244 0.41 % 1.06 % 12.48 %
Ethereum2,859.9 0.07 % 2.33 % 16.56 %
Cardano2.250 0.28 % 4.56 % 5.40 %
Tether0.9986 0.03 % 0.08 % 0.23 %
Binance Coin343.02 0.30 % 3.73 % 16.64 %
XRP0.9254 0.19 % 2.13 % 13.98 %
Solana131.45 0.00 % 7.30 % 22.73 %
USD Coin1.000 0.39 % 0.07 % 0.03 %
Polkadot30.87 2.19 % 17.29 % 10.73 %
Dogecoin0.2060 0.03 % 1.96 % 14.84 %

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 42,360.00
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,867.78
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 2.26
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
binance-coin
Binance Coin (BNB) $ 343.42
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.925654
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 131.82
usd-coin
USD Coin (USDC) $ 1.00
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 29.04
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.206601